Re:Forth Inventor Chuck Moore's $20 144 core CPU now in full...
by Symmetry on Tuesday November 22, 2011 @08:10PM
(#3268258)
Ooh, awesome. Clockless computing seems like a really nifty idea, but its difficult. I imagine it might go mainstream when Moore's law finally runs out.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Forth Inventor Chuck Moore's $20 144 core CPU now in full...
by sliverstorm on Tuesday November 22, 2011 @10:17PM
(#3268593)
"difficult" does not even begin to encompass the half of it. It is really cool in theory, but in reality a ridiculously difficult challenge that existing tools are in no way whatsoever up for.
Re:Forth Inventor Chuck Moore's $20 144 core CPU now in full...
by thesz on Wednesday November 23, 2011 @08:13AM
(#3269889)
Take a look at the Balsa design system: http://apt.cs.man.ac.uk/projects/tools/balsa/
My colleague uses it for research purposes and he said that it is pretty mature.
Re:Forth Inventor Chuck Moore's $20 144 core CPU now in full...
by sliverstorm on Wednesday November 23, 2011 @01:15PM
(#3270978)
I suspect if the only issue was translating architecture to logic, we'd be doing it already
Re:Forth Inventor Chuck Moore's $20 144 core CPU now in full...
by lgeek on Wednesday November 23, 2011 @02:19PM
(#3271301)
There are other asynchronous CPUs, including implementations of popular architectures like MIPS and ARM: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asynchronous_circuit#Asynchrono...