News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Forth Inventor Chuck Moore's $20 144 core CPU now in full... by ypcx on Tuesday November 22, 2011 @06:04PM (#3267852)
I knew it. The name "Moore" sounded suspicious to me immediately. Now I know his real name is Chuck Testa!!!

On a more serious note, what we need much more of is not the processing speed. What we need much more of is what I call "memory processability", which roughly means "how many times per second can you process the whole memory" - or something like that. Basically how much CPU is there per RAM. Indexing is a great hack, but a hack it still is. Memory and processing cells must be merged into a single, massively parallel chip.

Re:Forth Inventor Chuck Moore's $20 144 core CPU now in full... by thisrod on Tuesday November 22, 2011 @06:32PM (#3267949)
That was done in the 80's: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connection_Machine . Richard Feynman had to help the designers with the hard bits.

Users recall them fondly. In the end, clusters became too cheap for custom hardware like this to compete.

Re:Forth Inventor Chuck Moore's $20 144 core CPU now in full... by itsameta4 on Wednesday November 23, 2011 @12:50PM (#3270875)
>What we need much more of is what I call "memory processability", which roughly means "how many times per second can you process the whole memory"

I might be misinterpreting, but I think the phrase you're looking for is "memory bandwidth".