News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by Dylan16807 on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @02:34PM (#32666427)
> I would call it vigilantism which is a type of definitional terrorism.

Only if it's sufficiently political. Lots of DDoS is not. And that bar gets higher for an attack that's minimally violent.

Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by kodah on Thursday September 01, 2022 @01:25AM (#32672332)
There is no DDoS that's minimally violent. You are right though, not all DDoS attacks are politically motivated.
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by Dylan16807 on Thursday September 01, 2022 @11:40AM (#32678003)
Whatever, can we say it's a 3/10 or less on the violence scale instead of having an argument about what "minimal" means?
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by kodah on Friday September 02, 2022 @01:53PM (#32693716)
For certain things I will measure/compare harmfulness relative to potential outcomes because sometimes doing enforcement is suboptimal. In this case, however, we're talking about someone co-opting the governments monopoly on violence, which is more of an issue of principle. Once you let people co-opt that, it's a fairly run-away train. That's a long way of saying, for me this situation is very binary. There's no degrees of vigilantism.