Re:Software engineering research questions
by bee_rider on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @10:10AM
(#32662234)
This whole thread is silly, the outcomes we've had in the US are a result of our particular mix of central planning and market forces. And lots of central planning in implemented in the form of adding incentives to push market forces in the direction we want. And there's a whole lot of corporate lobbying going on in our "central" planning.
Attributing particular achievements to one or the other is impossible.
Re:Software engineering research questions
by WalterBright on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @09:48PM
(#32670840)
Volunteer projects are certainly part of the market and are subject to market forces.
> tax-funded government-managed research
Um, read up on the history of the 1903 Wright Flyer. It was not government managed research. The government project, Langley's airplane, fell into the Potomac like a sack of wet cement (and cost 20 times as much).
Computer networks grew out of telegraphy networks, which were privately funded.
Semiconductors came from Bell Labs, a private company.
Re:Software engineering research questions
by goodpoint on Thursday September 01, 2022 @11:29AM
(#32677804)
Between the cherry-picking and the strawmanning this post is worth little.
Re:Software engineering research questions
by WalterBright on Thursday September 01, 2022 @11:45AM
(#32678097)
Replying to the cherry picked points raised by you.
Not for a second. Ubuntu is a repackaged Debian and both Debian and Wikipedia are volunteer-driven.
They are not for sale and therefore unrelated to "market forces".
Besides, tax-funded government-managed research gave us telephone networks, semiconductors, computers, GSM, GPS, fiber optic, satellites, Internet, airplanes. Is that enough?