Re:What to read to understand how economists think
by ClumsyPilot on Saturday August 27, 2022 @11:35AM
(#32620129)
it appears that yout descruption equally applies to ancient rome - property rights were neforced, including on people. Price mechanism was used.
Was ancient Rome capitalist?
Re:What to read to understand how economists think
by fennecfoxen on Monday August 29, 2022 @10:43AM
(#32638911)
Ancient Rome, famed for its commerce, had a variety of capitalist features, though with significantly less productive use of invested capital, as one would expect of a pre-industrial society. Most people, however, would consider Roman slavery with people-as-property to be an abrogation of property-rights-in-the-self rather than just enforcement.
(There will be failures otherwise. Pollution ends up under A, monopolies under B, and a whole host of modern stupidities ends up under C — e.g. just for instance, no one at a minimum wage job is going to afford a lawyer to negotiate their employment contract: transaction costs are too high; the bigcorp employer, by contrast, only has to draw up the contract once. Instant structural unfairness follows.)
Orchestrating both information and incentives like this is really really hard. It's hard enough at a mid-sized project at a mid-sized company, where management spends hours and hours hammering on the idea of "alignment". At the scale of the global economy it's utterly intractable.