News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mudge's redacted Twitter whistleblower disclosure [pdf] by fragmede on Friday August 26, 2022 @02:43AM (#32604036)
Personally, I think Mudge wrote, hoping that this document was going to go before Congress and wrote for them, and that possibly that he would have to go before them. Thus the (over) use of bold emphasis is for a broad audience of which certain members won't (or can't) read as critically as others.

I'd write like there's no way this doesn't leak to the public eventually. It's Twitter we're talking about. Juicy gossip is the point of the platform so of course it's going to get spread. I don't know that it undercuts its message though.

Re:Mudge's redacted Twitter whistleblower disclosure [pdf] by maxbond on Friday August 26, 2022 @04:46AM (#32604786)
This doesn't really address any of the questions I posed.