News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by loeg on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @06:20PM (#32586564)
Tether has never worried about the rule of law before; why start now?
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by bioemerl on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @07:10PM (#32587099)
If the United States government wanted to kill crypto forever they could sanction tether and make all of the coin useless.

They're going to worry really hard about rule of law eventually

Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by JohnJamesRambo on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @07:14PM (#32587141)
Wouldn’t people just buy BTC and ETH with the banned Tether and pump them to the stratosphere as they tried to leave the sinking ship? I remember something similar happening in 2019 or so when there was some extreme Tether worry and the price of BTC started going up and up.

There’s a lot of money in stablecoins at the moment.

Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by onlyrealcuzzo on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @07:54PM (#32587494)
No, because someone would have to trade / buy the Tether, and no one would, so the price of Tether would drop like a stone - not the other way around.
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by SilasX on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @11:13PM (#32589016)
Somebody would! (Or rather, some thing.) There are a lot of smartcontract liquidity pools in Ethereum that facilitate trade between two tokens. The set an exchange rate by a formula that only looks at how much of each token is currently in the pool, not at prevailing market price[1].

So if and when it's apparent that Tether will be worthless, there will be a mad dash to dump it in those LPs in exchange for the other tokens, which was what happened to TerraUSD [2].

Here's a list of the LPs that have Tether as one token, just on Uniswap:

https://info.uniswap.org/#/tokens/0xdac17f958d2ee523a2206206...

[1] This dynamic has the effect of writing a persistent ITM option with intrinsic value equal to LP's price divergence from the market exchange rate.

[2] Here's Curve's infamous 4pool, which has TerraUSD (UST) and three other non-defunct stablecoins -- it's 97% UST now: https://curve.fi/4pool

Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by thematrixturtle on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @09:35PM (#32588292)
Both would happen simultaneously. Think of crypto like a balloon with only a narrow exit at one end going out into fiat: if you push down on Tether, BTC/ETH will inflate in Tether terms (because everybody who can moves into other cryptos) but deflate in USD terms (because there will be a run for the exits and a lack of buyers).
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by red_trumpet on Thursday August 25, 2022 @07:40AM (#32592341)
So both BTC/ETH and Tether would deflate in USD terms...
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by rcohngru on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @07:57PM (#32587512)
There are two sides to every trade. Who would be willing to give up their BTC and ETH for banned Tether?
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by octoberfranklin on Thursday August 25, 2022 @03:08AM (#32590545)
If the crash is bad enough: Tether itself. Or Bitfinex, its parent.

If they buy up their own debt at $0.01 on the dollar then they got away with their fractional reserving scheme, and their executives walk free. Free and very wealthy.

There is always a clearing price. The question is simply "how low"?

Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by JohnJamesRambo on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @10:23PM (#32588659)
My experience in crypto tells me that there is usually always someone willing to be on the other side of the trade. People exiting Tether would still be exiting through a smaller and smaller door of BTC and ETH going up and up. More and more desperate to pay any price to exit Tether.
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by JumpCrisscross on Thursday August 25, 2022 @01:10AM (#32589762)
> there is usually always someone willing to be on the other side of the trade

This is usually true in financial markets. When it's not, we call it a crisis.

Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by imtringued on Thursday August 25, 2022 @09:14AM (#32593278)
But at what price? Will tethers be sold to debt collectors for pennies?
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by qeternity on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @07:32PM (#32587299)
It went up _in USDT terms_

If Tether was sanctioned crypto would nuke in USD terms

Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by amluto on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @07:19PM (#32587184)
Suppose you owned clean ETH and someone offered you a 10% premium over the going rate if you were willing to accept sanctioned Tether in exchange. Would you really accept that deal?
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by patrickaljord on Thursday August 25, 2022 @08:41AM (#32592931)
According to the article, Tether is in direct and daily contact with US government institutions. So I guess, for whatever reason, the US gov is perfectly fine with Tether, probably because it's a great tool to spy on international transfers. This probably means Tether is here to stay.
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by wslh on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @06:42PM (#32586799)
There is not a single rule of law. This is not an statement in favor or against Tether.
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by loeg on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @08:33PM (#32587790)
What do the first few letters of USDT stand for?
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by chinathrow on Thursday August 25, 2022 @04:25AM (#32591079)
3 characters purely selected for marketing reasons. It could also be named WHCRST or any other name.
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by loeg on Thursday August 25, 2022 @01:48PM (#32597327)
It's extremely relevant that it tries to maintain a 1:1 peg with USD, not whatever currency WHCRS is. The US controls law around the US dollar.
Re:Tether will not freeze Tornado Cash addresses by chinathrow on Friday August 26, 2022 @08:56AM (#32606818)
The naming of the coin itself is for sure not relevant of its functionality, or what am I missing here?

The pegging is not achieved within the name itself.