Re:A Critique of SQL, 40 Years Later
by jakespoon on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @03:42PM
(#32584727)
Title may be correct. First sentence is totally wrong. Why would I read further?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Author here. Fixed the mistake. You may now proceed with reading the remainder of the post ;)
Re:A Critique of SQL, 40 Years Later
by cryptonector on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @04:01PM
(#32584983)
It's off by two years. People often round 48 to 50. I don't mind TFA rounding 48 to 50; you seem to, so don't read it if you don't want to.