News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by ChrisKnott on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @08:26AM (#32563833)
What evidence do you have to support this? Everything I can see suggests that they sincerely believe this will help protect children.
Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by wsc981 on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @11:45AM (#32566638)
The way the EU Commission handled whistleblower Roelie Post regarding child trafficking makes me think the safety of children is not the highest priority of the EU Commission. Even today she lives in fear and under a lot of pressure as can be seen on her Twitter account.

Basically the EU Commission punished her for being a whistleblower.

http://www.roeliepost.com/

https://www-vpro-nl.translate.goog/argos/lees/nieuws/2019/Ge...

Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by dangerface on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @10:33AM (#32565496)
What evidence is there that spying on the public will reduce child molestation? When you consider that the majority of perpetrators are family members how would spying on the publics chat help detect or prevent that? I don't think there are many child molesters boasting about it tbh. Would such a law prevent child molestation or prevent molesters from talking about it?

There is no evidence and little reason to believe this will protect children. Before infringing on innocent peoples privacy there must be some evidence that it will actually help protect children. There is no evidence to support this nor calls to study the efficacy idea. Makes me think protecting children is not the intention of their spying.

Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by Spivak on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @09:01AM (#32564288)
Especially because in the US we already do this and the sky hasn’t fallen. Storage providers and hosting services already scan for it and popular chat apps block sending matching images client side.

Like everyone saying this is the spiral to dystopia has to contend with the fact that we’re already apparently living in one.

Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by qubex on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @09:17AM (#32564478)
The sky hasn’t fallen?? Have you read https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/21/technology/google-surveil... ?
Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by donkeyd on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @09:54AM (#32564961)
Not the first of such stories either:

https://borncity.com/win/2020/08/16/microsoft-kontensperrung...

This is why I explicitly make on-site backups of anything that's in the cloud and don't store my passwords with Apple. If they suddenly decided I had CSAM for some reason, I'd be locked out of everything.

Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by Spivak on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @10:01AM (#32565042)
Google found an image of potential cp, literally a naked child, and forwarded it to the authorities to figure out if it was legit.

Other than the person having their Google account suspended which is a separate issue from the surveillance I see zero issue with the events as they happened. In a bygone era where you had to get photos developed I would have expected the 1 hour photo employee to do the same.

Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by qubex on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @10:11AM (#32565180)
That’s a totally alien idea to me. I grew up in a very nudity-friendly family in Europe and the idea that something as trivial as a naked photograph could occasion such a quasi-disaster is absolutely horrifying.
Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by kurupt213 on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @02:15PM (#32568883)
A photo of a naked child isn’t automatically CP
Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by Spivak on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @02:30PM (#32569093)
Which is was forwarded to the police for them to make that determination, do you want the alternative where Google decides?
Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by thfuran on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @09:18AM (#32564488)
A lot of Europeans would consider the US fairly dystopian, yes.
Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by WillPostForFood on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @09:09AM (#32564376)
The alarm here is because the EU is proposing mandating it, that’s not happened yet in the US.
Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by mardifoufs on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @10:52AM (#32565758)
What? The US doesn't do this. What's the law that mandates scanning chat messages?
Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by kurupt213 on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @02:16PM (#32568893)
I think the US does it without the law. They’re proactive like that