The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking chats

Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by Spivak on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @10:01AM (#32565042)

Google found an image of potential cp, literally a naked child, and forwarded it to the authorities to figure out if it was legit.

Other than the person having their Google account suspended which is a separate issue from the surveillance I see zero issue with the events as they happened. In a bygone era where you had to get photos developed I would have expected the 1 hour photo employee to do the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by qubex on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @10:11AM (#32565180)

That’s a totally alien idea to me. I grew up in a very nudity-friendly family in Europe and the idea that something as trivial as a naked photograph could occasion such a quasi-disaster is absolutely horrifying.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by kurupt213 on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @02:15PM (#32568883)

A photo of a naked child isn’t automatically CP

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The EU Commission accepts high error rates when checking ... by Spivak on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @02:30PM (#32569093)

Which is was forwarded to the police for them to make that determination, do you want the alternative where Google decides?

[ Parent | on HN ]