Re:Republishing a fork of the sanctioned Tornado Cash reposi...
by ipaddr on Monday August 22, 2022 @06:57PM
(#32558365)
What would that for you? Why the hope?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Republishing a fork of the sanctioned Tornado Cash reposi...
by ChrisAntaki on Monday August 22, 2022 @07:13PM
(#32558509)
I'm hoping the government makes money laundering harder. North Korea laundered a billion dollars through Tornado: https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/currencies/north-ko...
Re:Republishing a fork of the sanctioned Tornado Cash reposi...
by A4ET8a8uTh0 on Monday August 22, 2022 @08:14PM
(#32558993)
It may sound a little odd, but you do not think existing AML regime is already working in overdrive mode punishing regular people ( all while actual big fish manage to get away undetected or, worse, protected )?
Re:Republishing a fork of the sanctioned Tornado Cash reposi...
by EddySchauHai on Monday August 22, 2022 @08:22PM
(#32559047)
That's almost 0.3% of the money estimated to be laundered in the US through traditional means, and 0.05% of the estimated money laundered globally.
Re:Republishing a fork of the sanctioned Tornado Cash reposi...
by acdha on Monday August 22, 2022 @09:03PM
(#32559326)
It is a much larger percentage of North Korea’s total economy, however, and I think that’s going to turn out to be the primary motivation here: not that OFAC woke up one morning and said that Tornado Cash is public enemy #1 but that the people watching North Korea saw that ransomware proceeds were being laundered using this specific system and wanted to stop it.
Re:Republishing a fork of the sanctioned Tornado Cash reposi...
by absolutelynobo on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @03:40AM
(#32561674)
And AML wastes tens of billions of good dollars in GDP and revenue per year through added monitoring costs, insurance, enforcement expenses, etc. If AML were 90% effective, it’d be supported; but it’s more like 0.1% effective.