Re:Brian Kernighan adds Unicode support to Awk
by Turing_Machine on Saturday August 20, 2022 @04:33PM
(#32534968)
I've often wondered why there isn't a dependency system for TeX that lets you get only the packages you need... feed it a document and tell it to automatically download and install any missing packages.
There may be some technical reason why this isn't practical. Anyone know, offhand?
Re:Brian Kernighan adds Unicode support to Awk
by kccqzy on Saturday August 20, 2022 @04:43PM
(#32535019)
Totally practical and supported. See MikTeX: https://miktex.org/kb/just-enough-tex
But the reason I don't use it is because I don't always have Internet when I need to write my document. I'd rather download all the packages and their documentation beforehand.
Re:Brian Kernighan adds Unicode support to Awk
by bombcar on Saturday August 20, 2022 @08:24PM
(#32536310)
When stuck on a plane without wifi the only thing I could find on my computer to read were the Tex manuals. Good stuff.
Re:Brian Kernighan adds Unicode support to Awk
by rdlw on Saturday August 20, 2022 @05:53PM
(#32535465)
MikTeX also supports downloading individual packages, though I wish there was an option to download, say, the most commonly used 1GB or something.
Re:Brian Kernighan adds Unicode support to Awk
by mickmcq on Saturday August 20, 2022 @06:18PM
(#32535647)
There is a TeX distribution that does what you say, TinyTeX. For some reason it is obscure and only really used by R and R Studio users. That may be because it is used to render R Markdown documents to pdf.
But if you want to have every macro package that everyone everywhere likes, you're going to use some space.