Re:App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
by worble on Friday August 19, 2022 @06:27PM
(#32526777)
Exactly this, one of the things that really struck me about apps on fdroid is just how simple they are.
They do one thing, and (usually) do it pretty well, probably because the developers probably don't have the time and resources to do anything more than that. But that's perfect for someone who just wants the thing on their phone to do what it says on the tin.
Re:App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
by Apocryphon on Friday August 19, 2022 @06:36PM
(#32526860)
I'm convinced that if iOS was opened up to third party app stores, a potentially popular store wouldn't be a Facebook/Google monopoly store that exists solely for user tracking, but rather something boutique and niche like F-Droid (except maybe without the FOSS focus). The current App Store is huge and unwieldy, its search and discovery UX dated. There's ample room for third party app stores that specialize in high-quality design, or high-functionality minimalism, or privacy and security. They might even have higher standards than the official App Store.
Re:App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
by Marsymars on Friday August 19, 2022 @07:00PM
(#32527100)
> The current App Store is huge and unwieldy, its search and discovery UX dated.
It’s worse than dated. The top results are ads. I’d pay a monthly subscription fee to return to the App Store search/UX from before it had ads.
Re:App Store doesn't accept “too simple” apps
by Apocryphon on Friday August 19, 2022 @07:04PM
(#32527139)
And those ads actually cancel out search results!
In fact, aren't these preferable? I just want a weather app that shows me the current weather and a forecast, without any social bullshit, accounts, ads, etc.
Also, if iOS users have that "one app" they can't live without, surely it makes them stickier? Why would Apple want to limit the chances of hitting that spot with their users by curbing the number of apps available?