Re:Edible insects role in transmission of parasitic diseases...
by smcl on Thursday August 18, 2022 @07:24AM
(#32507988)
Weirdly chicken is dangerous to eat undercooked or raw, but there aren't as many cultural taboos against it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Edible insects role in transmission of parasitic diseases...
by peteradio on Thursday August 18, 2022 @09:19AM
(#32509177)
Were chickens present in the cultures 2000 years ago when the taboos developed? Honest question.
Re:Edible insects role in transmission of parasitic diseases...
by tintedfireglass on Thursday August 18, 2022 @09:29AM
(#32509289)
Yes, they were. Chickens are one of the oldest domesticated species by humans.
Re:Edible insects role in transmission of parasitic diseases...
by koheripbal on Thursday August 18, 2022 @08:38AM
(#32508755)
Because it's not as dangerous as eating raw pork. Relatively speaking, raw pork is much more dangerous.
Re:Edible insects role in transmission of parasitic diseases...
by steve_adams_86 on Thursday August 18, 2022 @09:43AM
(#32509461)
The data doesn’t back this up though. More people get sick from chicken.
Re:Edible insects role in transmission of parasitic diseases...
by kentrado on Friday August 19, 2022 @04:15AM
(#32518595)
We are not talking about quantity, we are talking about severity. Plus, you can't use modern data for this because modern stock raising methods mitigate a lot of the dangers from pork.
The parasites from undercooked pork can be very dangerous.
Re:Edible insects role in transmission of parasitic diseases...
by steve_adams_86 on Friday August 19, 2022 @04:22PM
(#32525546)
Why wouldn’t we use modern data? We’re not living in the past.
Are you talking about trichinosis? I can see that being more problematic than salmonella in historical contexts, but again, it’s highly treatable today and rarely fatal if it isn’t treated.
Am I missing some other kind of infection?
Edit: Now I see it, you were referring to the past in the parent comment. I’ve confused this thread for another - sorry about that!