News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:It wasn't for nothing by 3836293648 on Thursday August 18, 2022 @02:47AM (#32506141)
If you're just turning to flatpak, why are you even using guix in the first place?
Re:It wasn't for nothing by woojoo666 on Thursday August 18, 2022 @06:11AM (#32507473)
I assume for them, guix + a few proprietary bits is a better compromise than installing Windows
Re:It wasn't for nothing by sierkov on Thursday August 18, 2022 @04:20AM (#32506800)
Flatpak is not an OS. Weird question.
Re:It wasn't for nothing by 3836293648 on Monday August 22, 2022 @06:58PM (#32558376)
If you've turned to a system based on everything being perfectly declarative and reproducible, why would you then add an imperative autoupdating system on top of that? Of course you can, but if you're fine with that kind of system, why would you have turned to guix in the first place? It's not like it's just the popular default and you want to do something else on top, it's a super niche thing based specifically around this and you're breaking the core philosophy
Re:It wasn't for nothing by k__ on Thursday August 18, 2022 @04:38AM (#32506899)
I had the impression, Guix was a package manager and GuixSD the OS?
Re:It wasn't for nothing by sierkov on Thursday August 18, 2022 @04:47AM (#32506940)
It is all just Guix now. It's both package and systems manager.
Re:It wasn't for nothing by rekado on Thursday August 18, 2022 @11:12AM (#32510791)
The OS is called "Guix System". Without the system part it's just "Guix".

Both variants are very similar. The Guix tool comes with a "guix system" command, which lets you build Guix System containers, container images, system images, qemu VM images, qemu VM scripts, etc. The only command that won't work on a "foreign" distro is "guix system reconfigure" --- but that's only a "guix system init /" away ;)

Re:It wasn't for nothing by xyzzy_plugh on Thursday August 18, 2022 @05:43AM (#32507288)
This is precisely my confusion.