Re:Ask HN: Did Facebook just stop fighting adblockers?
by bryanrasmussen on Tuesday August 16, 2022 @04:44AM
(#32480586)
you would of course have to take it to court to have the court decide that yes, that was part of the definition of accessibility, I do not think that is part of any of the WAI or WCAG definitions although it would a good idea to ask for it, in fact I guess I will raise the issue later today on a mailing list.
But if you took it to court, in the U.S, if it went all the way to Supreme Court I have hard time believing it would not be denied. So effectively, they are not obligated to let you know which is which.
But if you took it to court, in the U.S, if it went all the way to Supreme Court I have hard time believing it would not be denied. So effectively, they are not obligated to let you know which is which.
on edit: in initial discussion it was said " 1.1.1 Non-text Content, or 1.3.1 Info and Relationships." https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/info-and-relatio... might be used as an argument that unidentifiable Ad content would be non-accessible https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/info-and-relatio...