Re:Timelock Encryption made possible and easy to use
by h0h0h0h0111 on Monday August 15, 2022 @09:01PM
(#32477929)
there is no blockchain involved at all
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Timelock Encryption made possible and easy to use
by wslh on Tuesday August 16, 2022 @06:26AM
(#32481119)
I used the term blockchain with liberty, it is based on a consensus mechanism so you need to assume the consensus is right which is different of timelock encryption usage in classic ways. The README was edited after the HN posts.
Re:Timelock Encryption made possible and easy to use
by h0h0h0h0111 on Tuesday August 16, 2022 @06:34PM
(#32489877)
It's not really a consensus mechanism either really - the randomness in some sense is deterministic, it just requires participation. I'm unsure which 'classic ways' you're referring to - in principle it's not that different to having a notary, except the notary is a distributed network rather than a single entity.
> The README was edited after the HN posts.
You can see from that the tlock git history the README.md hasn't been updated in 13 days and the tlock-js one hasn't been updated in 4 days - both before the HN post. Are you talking about another README?