I really doubt this is where "nth order" comes from colloquially.
There are many examples in physics, for example: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/310875/second-or...
Yes, but physics is not colloquial. Most people are unfamiliar with physics.
This is what I've always assumed as well. The feeling of "things that usually don't matter but may explode (if it turns out the series doesn't converge)" seems to fit the expression pretty well.
Higher order functions have nothing to do with derivatives however.
Re:Second-Order Thinking
by earleybird on Monday August 15, 2022 @01:24PM
(#32472555)
However, regular types do: "The Derivative of a Regular Type is its Type of One-Hole Contexts"
Re:Second-Order Thinking
by cbm-vic-20 on Monday August 15, 2022 @11:21AM
(#32470843)
E = mc^2 is a notable example.
Also, it's often practical to ignore 2nd order and higher terms, because then you have a linear function - something really easy to work with. Therefore, "2nd order effects" have effectively become synonymous to "non-linear effects".