News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by citizenpaul on Sunday August 14, 2022 @12:58PM (#32460810)
I feel like the pendulum has swung too far the other direction these days. It used to be we'll have cold fusion in 20 years which was hopelessly over optimistic. Nowdays its. We are spending 10 years on a myopic proof of concept that has no practical uses and never will.
Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by dcow on Sunday August 14, 2022 @03:55PM (#32462369)
We're just biding our time until 2050, at which point we will unlock the ability to build industrial scale fusion energy plants.
Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by planck01 on Sunday August 14, 2022 @04:04PM (#32462449)
I would love that. But honestly, I would be surprised if fusion energy will be economically feasible before 2100. If ever.
Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by jefftk on Sunday August 14, 2022 @04:10PM (#32462491)
I'd bet on that. I'd give Commonwealth Fusion Systems alone 40% in the next 20 years.

More on recent fusion developments: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/your-book-review-the-f...

Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by planck01 on Sunday August 14, 2022 @05:22PM (#32463054)
I hope you win! I usually get my reality checks from Sabine Hossenfelder, who a while back explained that all these fusion claims are wildly optimistic. You can find her video here: https://youtu.be/LJ4W1g-6JiY

I am no scientist, so it is hard for me to know if team optimistic or team pessimistic is right. But even if it is the latter, I think we should put more money and research on it!

Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by jefftk on Sunday August 14, 2022 @07:50PM (#32464299)
The video isn't nuts, but it's mostly focused on clearing up a common misconception around what "break even" means. It discusses how ITER is not going to be powering the grid in 2025 (strong agree) but I don't see any discussion of the commercialization projects (of which Commonwealth is the strongest) or discussion of timescales anywhere near 2100.
Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by mlindner on Sunday August 14, 2022 @09:11PM (#32464768)
> Sabine Hossenfelder

FYI she's largely been debunked as a fear monger. She swings the pendulum too far in the other direction when reality is somewhere in between.

Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by rini17 on Monday August 15, 2022 @04:13PM (#32474790)
Sources pls?
Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by dcow on Sunday August 14, 2022 @04:25PM (#32462620)
According to SimCity, the year is 2050 on the dot.
Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by MonkeyMalarky on Sunday August 14, 2022 @04:32PM (#32462678)
Just watch out for any stray solar microwave beams in the mean time.
Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by panick21_ on Monday August 15, 2022 @09:46AM (#32469624)
Fusion will never be cheaper then fission.

Unless maybe if somebody figures out aneutronic fusion but we are nowhere close yet.

Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by flatiron on Sunday August 14, 2022 @09:14PM (#32464784)
Would be interesting if solar beats it out. Both honestly are fusion energy.
Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by readthenotes1 on Sunday August 14, 2022 @03:05PM (#32461943)
One of my elderly relatives commented last week that he has been hearing that the new experimental results will promise reliable fusion plants in less than a decade ... Since 1960

(He used to be one of those guys inside an ICBM silo during the Cold war)

Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by seedless-sensat on Sunday August 14, 2022 @02:57PM (#32461857)
The private fusion companies still have ambitious (and most likely unrealistic) goals
Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by AtlasBarfed on Sunday August 14, 2022 @03:13PM (#32462017)
So did the Moller Air Car.

Moller at least had a brief prototype that hovered.

There are probably real scientists, engineers, and approaches, but it's probably about fleecing dumb investors at a fundamental level.

Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu... by SV_BubbleTime on Sunday August 14, 2022 @03:29PM (#32462162)
I maintain that we would be further along with fusion had we not kneecapped fission into a regulatory abyss.