Re:Samurai: Ninja-compatible build tool written in C
by plorkyeran on Sunday August 14, 2022 @01:06AM
(#32456512)
Why would I want to use this instead of ninja? It’s apparently a drop-in replacement but it doesn’t say what it’s trying to do better than the original.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Samurai: Ninja-compatible build tool written in C
by ori_b on Sunday August 14, 2022 @02:47AM
(#32457028)
The code is readable and maintainable, and can be used in the Linux distro that the author maintains without pulling in a huge number of dependencies to build a C++ compiler.
Re:Samurai: Ninja-compatible build tool written in C
by BaculumMeumEst on Sunday August 14, 2022 @02:51AM
(#32457046)
“written in C99 with a focus on simplicity, speed, and portability” is what appears to differentiate it from ninja. if that sounds interesting you should check it out and if not skip it
Re:Samurai: Ninja-compatible build tool written in C
by plorkyeran on Sunday August 14, 2022 @10:37AM
(#32459606)
Ninja is already fast, simple, and portable, so those aren’t differentiating factors. It appears to just be ninja but written in a different programming language.