Re:Mailchimp Slams Door for Crypto Content Without Warning
by verdverm on Saturday August 13, 2022 @11:37PM
(#32456098)
To a reasonable person, Tornado Cash is not acceptable, which is something the crypto commodity space will have to accept. Technical details do not matter, Tor has nothing to do with it. The sanctions impact people and their financial transactions, even if there is some code in there. Sure they listed addresses, it's not the first time, and it will be people who get in trouble for interacting with these addresses. That there is "autonomous" code is besides the point, most code is autonomous anyway.
If you support evil, there will be repercussions. Your participation in the pool is sufficient material support. We have laws, adjust to obey them or risk getting in trouble.
Re:Mailchimp Slams Door for Crypto Content Without Warning
by randomran01234 on Sunday August 14, 2022 @07:50AM
(#32458491)
Sad and troubling that so many people hearing this will equate privacy with evil and illegal behavior. This is why I am pointing out Tor, because there are many licit users of it.
Re:Mailchimp Slams Door for Crypto Content Without Warning
by verdverm on Sunday August 14, 2022 @09:09AM
(#32458948)
Tornado wouldn't be needed if Blockchain wasn't so flawed to begin with. Bunch of techno utopians thinking their way is better for everyone and don't want to hear any criticism or that their ideas aren't actually good... smh
What is sad is that you use and reuse hyperbole as a talking point
The only fees taken are relay fees, which can be anybody - not necessarily the developers. The conversation steers back to whether it is illegal to run a Tor exit node and whether it is illegal to develop Tor the open source project. Tornado Cash can be republished without relay fees, with zero governance, no token, would that be acceptable?