Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012)
by archi42 on Saturday August 13, 2022 @03:05AM
(#32447575)
I agree with you, GP is wrong about the "generally". We did use the isValid variant (and the odd factory once in a blue moon) at $former_job, no exceptions but a lot of other very nice things about C++ (as they became available).
But the article is a decade old, the project started 2007. So there is a good chance the project couldn't even use c++11 features.
I still recall using initializer lists on my Linux machine only to have the nightly Windows builds fail (we were stuck on an old msvc for a while; the day we upgraded it there was much rejoice).
But the article is a decade old, the project started 2007. So there is a good chance the project couldn't even use c++11 features. I still recall using initializer lists on my Linux machine only to have the nightly Windows builds fail (we were stuck on an old msvc for a while; the day we upgraded it there was much rejoice).
//Some light editing