How do you know that this guy was arrested "just for writing open source code?"

The whole point of my comment was that he was probably arrested for more than that... Or at least, we should wait to see what the evidence against the guy is.

If you go around saying "the sky is falling! they're coming for the developers!" then it turns out the guy was actually doing bad stuff to help launder money, you're going to make it that much harder to get people's attention when there is an actual abuse of police power.

> How do you know that this guy was arrested "just for writing open source code?"

I don't know that, but that currently appears to be the case and I have yet to see any evidence to the contrary.

EDIT: The title of the page is "Arrest of suspected developer of Tornado Cash". So they are certainly making it appear that they consider having developed Tornado Cash to itself be worthy of arrest.

The article doesn't actually say he was arrested for being the developer of Tornado Cash. It might be trying to imply that (or offer an explanation of what the connection is between the arrest and the investigation into Tornado Cash). All the article asserts is that he is suspected to be the developer of Tornado Cash, and that he was arrested "[under suspicion] of involvement in concealing criminal financial flows and facilitating money laundering" via Tornado Cash. That could (and likely does) mean that he was involved in far more than just development.

> where no one had ever been arrested just for writing open source code.

But was he arrested for _just_ the code he wrote? Or more, and the code was just an ancillary property of the person being arrested?