Re:Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech
by PurpleRamen on Friday August 12, 2022 @09:38AM
(#32438441)
Smells like law-evasion, so scam the state.
What assets/values do you need to manage? What does permissionless means in that case? And why is crypto superior to existing solutions? And no, self-sovereignity is not an acceptable answer here, unless you life in north-korea.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech
by dashdot on Friday August 12, 2022 @11:37AM
(#32440150)
Absolutely not. My country wants to know what assets (or waht they're worth to be more precise) I have end of Year, so I declare it. I have no problems with that. Good living conditions have a price so I happily pay my cut. If I don't like it, I'll leave.
Permissionless means that there is no central entity needed to observe or even approve my actions with my assets.
What existing solutions?
I strongly disagree, self-soverignty is a personal decision. It doesn't matter in what country you live.
Re:Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech
by nibbleshifter on Friday August 12, 2022 @10:08AM
(#32438889)
To put it bluntly: fuck the state.