Re:Tell HN: Unpaid home assignments are not ok
by LocalPCGuy on Friday August 12, 2022 @09:29AM
(#32438313)
I'd challenge you to consider that take home tasks are better for some interviewees, but others would do better to have that task done as part of the interview (in-person, video). Offering an option (maybe even ahead of time) allows the individual to play to their strengths and situation, and properly designed (and with good questions/exercises to ensure people who are just good interviewees don't BS their way through the process) it shouldn't make much difference which option the interviewee chooses.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tell HN: Unpaid home assignments are not ok
by shafyy on Friday August 12, 2022 @10:21AM
(#32439101)
Sure, why not offer an option. But I'm convinced that take home tasks are generally better because that's much closer to the way you actually work as a programmer. People who don't get nervous during live coding might like take home tasks because it's more of a time sink, but I'd wager that they still do good on them.
Re:Tell HN: Unpaid home assignments are not ok
by LocalPCGuy on Friday August 12, 2022 @10:27AM
(#32439195)
There are a lot of problems with take-home assignments in general and I feel like it discounts that to just say "they are better generally". I disagree with that statement both personally, as an interviewer, and in reading others' anecdotal experiences. It is better "for some people some of the time", but I firmly disagree that can be generalized to a best practice.