News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984) by e12e on Thursday August 11, 2022 @05:11PM (#32431760)
I think openstep, objective-c and cocoa owes a great deal to smalltalk. I'm not sure if objective-c ever was any better (or practical) than smalltalk/strongtalk/self (or Java) - but it's at least possible to dream of the macos going for smalltalk, not obj-c.
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984) by Jtsummers on Thursday August 11, 2022 @05:28PM (#32431944)
Objective-C had the primary benefit (over Smalltalk) of being a superset of C, which permitted immediate and easy interaction between Objective-C and C source code. It also integrated better (which was critical, Smalltalk doesn't force using the image model for source code, but it was typical) into existing development workflows. Those are the kinds of practical concerns that can't be neglected when considering language adoption, especially since NeXT (main early adopter) was building on the lineage of the Unix-family of operating systems.
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984) by e12e on Friday August 12, 2022 @06:57AM (#32436720)
True enough.

As for other descendants, ruby is of course deeply inspired by smalltalk.