News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Francis Fukuyama: Paths to Depolarization by ZeroGravitas on Thursday August 11, 2022 @04:28AM (#32422988)
Because its so much better than what we have, people who care about the real life outcome, not the academic arguments, realise that any of the sensible choices would be better and so other factors, like name recognition or existing usage, dominate over any minor further improvements.
Re:Francis Fukuyama: Paths to Depolarization by panick21_ on Thursday August 11, 2022 @07:47AM (#32424270)
Its not an academic argument. Its a why don't we do something that is simpler and easier to understand and has better outcomes.

He you know how you evaluate restaurants, books, and most other things in live? You give things a score. That's how should evaluate politicians as well.

And guess what, the outcomes will be mostly intuitive rather then confusing as often happens with ranked choice.