Re:'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg so...
by endtime on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @07:36PM
(#32419819)
At Google, which I'm pretty confident the parent comment was describing, promotion is supposed to be recognition that you've already been consistently performing at that level for a long time. So someone newly promoted is not actually up-leveled, they're just no longer down-leveled.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg so...
by nr2x on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @11:44PM
(#32421329)
I’m aware, point stands. If you meet somebody for the first time the L* sets an expectation. You need to grow into it.
Re:'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg so...
by refulgentis on Thursday August 11, 2022 @12:04AM
(#32421465)
Not in this case, here, my claim is the role was very clearly grown into, and the rating reflected the fact that these decisions are mostly tenure-based, + or - 2 or 3 years, and the rating was always going to be average even if I cured cancer, as was explicitly spelled out later. That disincentives putting in effort because it doesn't matter. Creates an uncomfortable nihilist atmosphere that can be suffocatingly depressive
Re:'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg so...
by endtime on Thursday August 11, 2022 @11:04AM
(#32426846)
Yeah...in at least one part of Google, as recently as last year, getting a rating higher than "meets expectations" in the second perf cycle after promo required a VP to approve an exception. Part of why I left.