News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Francis Fukuyama: Paths to Depolarization by overthemoon on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @09:13AM (#32411352)
"Polarization" is not, in fact, the "the single greatest weakness of the United States as a country today." I am so sick to death of this sentiment. Fukuyama and guys like him love systems, they love tinkering, they love efficiency, they love "getting stuff done". Never mind the unspoken ideology of the middle, never mind what we're actually trying to achieve has a distinct ideological identity, we're political engineers, here! We're just trying to fix the system! It's almost like they're optimizing for bill passage rate.

I reject the idea that technical moderates are the default, that they're non-ideological, and that a watery combination of left and right ideas is best because it appeals to the most people, if only because we've been doing exactly that since the 80s and it's gotten us here.

Re:Francis Fukuyama: Paths to Depolarization by D13Fd on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @12:56PM (#32415112)
> "Polarization" is not, in fact, the "the single greatest weakness of the United States as a country today."

Ok, what are bigger weaknesses than the current polarization?

Re:Francis Fukuyama: Paths to Depolarization by random314 on Thursday August 11, 2022 @12:31AM (#32421610)
Health insurance, student loans and high home prices.
Re:Francis Fukuyama: Paths to Depolarization by drewcoo on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @12:03PM (#32414242)
> "Polarization" is not, in fact, the "the single greatest weakness of the United States as a country today."

Agreed, but actual problems aren't profitable enough to garner much media attention.

Re:Francis Fukuyama: Paths to Depolarization by panick21_ on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @04:07PM (#32417671)
Switzerland has a much more distributed system and that certainty does not lead to "optimizing for bill passage rate".

> because we've been doing exactly that since the 80s

One can do the right things badly.