Re:How (and Why) Neil Gaiman Finally Adapted ‘The Sandman’ f...
by taeric on Sunday August 07, 2022 @09:50PM
(#32381718)
I'm not sure I follow. Most of the examples you used still centered on main characters for the series. They were often disjoint story lines.
None of which is to say that this is unique. It just isn't what I would call formulaic.
Re:How (and Why) Neil Gaiman Finally Adapted ‘The Sandman’ f...
by tptacek on Sunday August 07, 2022 @11:24PM
(#32382149)
It's not a comedy trope here (it also predates Seinfeld by several months). It's more a trope of the Sandman comic, of finding excuses to tell slightly-edge backstory narratives and doing little character studies, then knitting all the characters together to make something happen. Basically all of Sandman works that way.
Movies are less susceptible to being described as formulaic, but an iconic movie, The Big Lebowski, could reasonably be summarized this way (albeit the series is serialized into one piece). Coffee and Cigarettes doesn’t satisfy the “nobodies” in the literal sense, but it’s almost entirely this formula.
I’m just citing examples I can think of, I haven’t watched most of what people have watched. And I don’t mean in any way to dismiss the actual work, or the concept, or your finding novelty in it. It’s a really cool device for storytelling, but it’s definitely not a unique device.