News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Electronics are built with death dates. Let’s not keep th... by thaumasiotes on Saturday August 06, 2022 @09:01PM (#32372931)
> instead of emphasising the wattage of a bulb, if you showed the lumens/$, more efficient bulbs would naturally win out. Instead, LED bulbs have fake wattage numbers to show the equivalent wattage incandescent lighting that would be needed to match the LED.

I don't understand what the problem is supposed to be. The system we currently have is that all bulbs are labeled with their brightness ("equivalent wattage"), which is the outcome the customer cares about. You can then choose the cheapest bulb at the brightness level you want. That second step already causes more efficient bulbs to crowd less efficient bulbs out of the market.

In your hypothetical system, we stop indicating how bright bulbs are. Instead, we indicate how efficient they are, and customers are supposed to work out the brightness for themselves.

Why would anyone want that?

Re:Electronics are built with death dates. Let’s not keep th... by coryrc on Saturday August 06, 2022 @09:28PM (#32373075)
I think GP meant per $ of running cost. I have seen LEDs that are only 2/3 as efficient: "60W equivalent" using 11W at a reduced lumen level, instead of 8W at, iirc, 800 lumen.
Re:Electronics are built with death dates. Let’s not keep th... by eru on Saturday August 06, 2022 @10:17PM (#32373313)
But the packaging gives you both the brightness in the slightly weird unit of 'equivalent wattage' and the actual wattage. So you can make those choices.