News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NSA, NIST, and post-quantum crypto: my second lawsuit aga... by MauranKilom on Friday August 05, 2022 @08:15PM (#32363472)
> are there encryption methods that actually do not suffer from reductions in randomness or entropy etc when just simply running the algorithm on the encrypted output multiple times?

Unless you can prove that all e.g. 2^256 possible 256 bit inputs map to 2^256 different 256 bit outputs (for every key, in the case of encryption), then chances are you lose strength with every application because multiple inputs map to the same output (and consequently some outputs are not reachable).

Re:NSA, NIST, and post-quantum crypto: my second lawsuit aga... by comex on Friday August 05, 2022 @09:10PM (#32363822)
For encryption, as opposed to hashing, you can’t have multiple inputs map to the same output, because then you wouldn’t be able to decrypt the output.
Re:NSA, NIST, and post-quantum crypto: my second lawsuit aga... by adgjlsfhk1 on Friday August 05, 2022 @09:14PM (#32363848)
it's very easy to prove that all encryption functions are 1 to 1. Otherwise, you couldn't decrypt the data.