> Frequentism is not the null ritual. In fact, it's almost completely compatible with bayesianism, the one large difference being the freedom to set priors before doing your analysis.

This may be true of "frequentism" in a strict sense, but many statistical methods in common use that are often described as such (including, arguably, NHST) are not consistent with reasonable versions of the likelihood principle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Likelihood_principle . In a sense, one might feasibly argue that these methods are not even properly frequentist.