Re:It is time to stop teaching frequentism to non-statistici...
by themenomen on Thursday August 04, 2022 @10:21AM
(#32343271)
If I write an article about the benefits of X drug and have expressed publicly by other channels my support for the company that produces such drug, I think is relevant for the discussion of the article I just wrote. That's why I said that may be it is not the case here, as I my self don't see any relationship between the linked tweets and the article. But I don't think is to crazy to think that two related opinions can be analyzed together regardless of the channels of distribution.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:It is time to stop teaching frequentism to non-statistici...
by bart_spoon on Saturday August 06, 2022 @10:10AM
(#32368238)
If you write an article about the benefits of X drug, you have presumably made arguments that can or can not be supported with available evidence. Your other interactions with the company producing the drug are irrelevant.