Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by cwillu on Monday August 01, 2022 @12:42PM
(#32308709)
Wrong photo: this just shows a bunch of disembodied heads floating down a street.
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by _petronius on Monday August 01, 2022 @12:38PM
(#32308648)
Maybe it is related to dazzle camoflauge used on ships? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazzle_camouflage
There the goal is less to avoid detection and more to make it hard to determine direction/orientation.
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by rtkwe on Monday August 01, 2022 @05:16PM
(#32312130)
Dazzle camo wasn't so much a "hide me" camo as it was a "hide data needed to shot me" camo. It was designed to make it harder to estimate heading and speed so it was harder to calculate accurate shots by submarines and naval guns which needed data about the target ship's speed, distance and heading to calculate an accurate shot.
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by int_19h on Monday August 01, 2022 @10:00PM
(#32314398)
This is true for modern infantry camo, as well - it aims to disrupt the human silhouette at a distance, not only to make it harder to spot, but also to make it harder to aim center mass (can be tricky if the visual border of said mass is all fuzzy and blends into the surroundings!).
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by rtkwe on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @09:33AM
(#32318251)
The distinction I was making was that dazzle doesn't really hide things at all where uniform camo does try to hide the person somewhat.
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by ncmncm on Monday August 01, 2022 @07:03PM
(#32313236)
Radar killed dazzle.
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by rtkwe on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @10:16AM
(#32318736)
It's definitely the final nail in it's widespread use but it was used somewhat up to the end of WW2 though that focused on anti-kamikaze painting in the Pacific theater. Japan was several years behind the rest of the world on radar so it stuck around longer in the Pacific too before that transition to anti-kamikaze but even there by the end of the war Japan was using radar fire-control.
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by jabl on Monday August 01, 2022 @01:22PM
(#32309265)
My guess would be that the thinking behind it was that in urban environments you have more straight vertical/horizontal lines (houses, roads etc.) and thus wavy camouflage patterns would stand out more from the background.
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by kingofpandora on Monday August 01, 2022 @12:40PM
(#32308687)
Honestly, the first thing that came to mind was the pattern used on V-2 rockets: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocket ...
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by WooAndMayIAdHoo on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @05:08AM
(#32316563)
That pattern was only ever used in testing, so any spin or yaw could be easily identified.
V2 rockets used in anger all used "ordinary" camouflage to hide their location prior to launch.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Infantry_Brigade#/media...