Re:Wikipedia has blocked editing ‘recession’ as people chang...
by ChrisLomont on Monday August 01, 2022 @08:32AM
(#32305052)
There's historical evidence that calling something a recession, if it is not, tends to push it into a recession.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wikipedia has blocked editing ‘recession’ as people chang...
by bluefirebrand on Monday August 01, 2022 @09:31AM
(#32305687)
It seems unlikely that theres sufficient evidence to claim causality here.
Honestly? If you say "we're in a recession" and then it turns out it is or becomes a recession, it sounds like you were right. Not that you caused it.
Re:Wikipedia has blocked editing ‘recession’ as people chang...
by ChrisLomont on Monday August 01, 2022 @05:20PM
(#32312171)
Here's but one of many papers https://www.jstor.org/stable/29794227.
Dig through google scholar using terms like "confidence" and "recession" to find many more.
Re:Wikipedia has blocked editing ‘recession’ as people chang...
by checkyoursudo on Monday August 01, 2022 @09:55AM
(#32305972)
This contradicts my best evidence based on the widespread joke that "economists have predicted nine of the last five recessions." Big, if true.
Re:Wikipedia has blocked editing ‘recession’ as people chang...
by ChrisLomont on Monday August 01, 2022 @05:20PM
(#32312174)
Here's but one of many papers https://www.jstor.org/stable/29794227.
Dig through google scholar using terms like "confidence" and "recession" to find many more.
Re:Wikipedia has blocked editing ‘recession’ as people chang...
by ccvannorman on Monday August 01, 2022 @09:25AM
(#32305613)
This seems like a great example of anti-data .. do you have any source at all to back this up?
Re:Wikipedia has blocked editing ‘recession’ as people chang...
by ChrisLomont on Monday August 01, 2022 @05:20PM
(#32312175)
Here's but one of many papers https://www.jstor.org/stable/29794227.
Dig through google scholar using terms like "confidence" and "recession" to find many more.