Re:Wayland Core Protocol Is Tailored Only for Gnome and That...
by brnt on Sunday July 31, 2022 @03:58PM
(#32298276)
> KDE on Wayland is currently broken on FreeBSD.
Is for me too on Linux. On both a variety of Intel and Nvidia GPUs. On a variety of distros. And everytime I ask around, I'm told it works for others, so it must be me. Everytime forcing X11 solves all my problems.
To be honest, last time I tried KDE on Wayland was a year ago, so perhaps it works now. Then again, so many years have passed where it turned out it didn't, that I'm not particularly keen to try.
Re:Wayland Core Protocol Is Tailored Only for Gnome and That...
by c7DJTLrn on Sunday July 31, 2022 @04:05PM
(#32298318)
It's arguable whether sway is "simple". Last I remember it clocked in at ~50k lines of C excluding wlroots.
Some X window managers are a few hundred lines.
Re:Wayland Core Protocol Is Tailored Only for Gnome and That...
by d_tr on Sunday July 31, 2022 @04:54PM
(#32298750)
FWIW, i3 is in the same ballpark, maybe a bit less if I am not mistaken.
Re:Wayland Core Protocol Is Tailored Only for Gnome and That...
by Daishiman on Sunday July 31, 2022 @04:35PM
(#32298584)
Sounds like functionality that can be turned into a common library.
Re:Wayland Core Protocol Is Tailored Only for Gnome and That...
by Gigachad on Monday August 01, 2022 @03:11AM
(#32302998)
It is. Sway is based on WLRoots which you can easily import and build a new window manager on with minimal code.
Most of the wayland fud is either seriously out of date, mistaken, or malicious.
Personally I also still use X11. Mainly because KDE on Wayland is currently broken on FreeBSD. And I'm not in a hurry anyway.