News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Famous HNers and their sites by baisq on Sunday July 31, 2022 @06:22AM (#32294591)
That is a distortion of my entire comment.

There are sites where the user split per sex is around 2:1. The female-dominated ones are generally more vapid than the male-dominated ones. You can check yourself. That is not to say that male-dominated ones are never vapid. To put it in other words, I would say that almost all female-dominated ones are vapid, while "only" the majority of the male-dominated ones are vapid.

Re:Famous HNers and their sites by implements on Sunday July 31, 2022 @08:13AM (#32295010)
Britain’s https://www.mumsnet.com/ is far from vapid:

“When Mumsnet speaks, politicians listen”

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12238447

Elsewhere: “Professor Pedersen believes Mumsnet’s popularity is partly down to it being a place where women can talk freely about politics without being drowned out by male voices or being subjected to the nastier side of other social media platforms.”

Re:Famous HNers and their sites by teddyh on Sunday July 31, 2022 @09:33AM (#32295371)
You found a single exception to baisq’s proposed general principle. This is not a good enough argument to refute it.