News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Allocating resources where they solve the most important ... by teddyh on Saturday July 30, 2022 @12:03PM (#32287818)
“If what you are doing is not important, and if you don't think it is going to lead to something important, why are you working on it?”

— Richard Hamming

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3msMuwqp-o&list=PLctkxgWNSR...

Re:Allocating resources where they solve the most important ... by dahfizz on Saturday July 30, 2022 @12:08PM (#32287865)
Because it pays your bills...?
Re:Allocating resources where they solve the most important ... by trasz on Sunday July 31, 2022 @05:18PM (#32298934)
I.e. because of a bug in economy which makes useless or harmful jobs profitable.
Re:Allocating resources where they solve the most important ... by dahfizz on Monday August 01, 2022 @08:28AM (#32305012)
It depends on how you define "important", I guess. Flipping burgers is not relatively important, useless, or harmful. It's not a "bug". It's just something that has to get done, so we pay people to do it.
Re:Allocating resources where they solve the most important ... by trasz on Monday August 01, 2022 @09:41AM (#32305806)
Flipping burgers is useful work. Working in spam center is harmful. Web search is useful. Spying on users is not. And so on; I don’t think it’s hard to grasp.

Economy exists because it’s beneficial to society. When it results in gratifying behaviors that harm the society, I’d say it’s a bug.

Re:Allocating resources where they solve the most important ... by dahfizz on Monday August 01, 2022 @02:18PM (#32310089)
> Flipping burgers is useful work.

We were talking about important work, thus my point about how you want to define important.

Screwdrivers are useful, but none of the screwdrivers I own are important. I could lose one and not notice.

I don't think it's hard to grasp.