Re:How Wikipedia influences judicial behavior
by mountainb on Wednesday July 27, 2022 @09:09PM
(#32259243)
The citations on Wikipedia articles are often either broken, in a foreign language, or not up to an academic standard. However, following this practice is what eventually lead me to stop using Wikipedia for anything. When I tried to trace the citations to make my research easier, I found it actually made it a lot slower because I kept running into junk. Before I actually paid attention to the citations on a broad selection of articles, I was under the mistaken belief that Wikipedia was "good enough."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How Wikipedia influences judicial behavior
by MisterMower on Wednesday July 27, 2022 @11:03PM
(#32260042)
They have weird requirements for citations. Want to cite a link to a blog where a guy has spent 20,000 hours researching a topic but doesn’t have a degree? Not allowed. Want to post a link to a NYT article written by a journalist with no relevant experience in that same field? Go for it. It’s really strange. It’s like they’re aiming for narrative over fact or something.
Re:How Wikipedia influences judicial behavior
by asdff on Thursday July 28, 2022 @12:21AM
(#32260457)
To be fair usually when the nyt article is wrong they issue a retraction and when the blogger is wrong they triple down
Re:How Wikipedia influences judicial behavior
by pwdisswordfish0 on Friday July 29, 2022 @10:24AM
(#32277312)
Citation needed.