News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Identity of Kim Il Sung (1949) [pdf] by MichaelCollins on Monday July 25, 2022 @07:55AM (#32223131)
Saying the inverse of what you actually believe but with a tone that suggests insincerity isn't comedic. It's just obnoxious.
Re:The Identity of Kim Il Sung (1949) [pdf] by rjzzleep on Monday July 25, 2022 @09:04AM (#32223703)
I can see why calling out the hypocrisies of the hysteria of people like you would seem obnoxious to you.

EDIT: Comical indeed that MichaelCollins feels the need to come to muruculas rescue. The thread didn't start with murucula, it started with people saying they should not open NK PDF's because they're dangerous. The mindless hysteria could only have been trumped by people accusing one of China and Russia stoogedom in the comments below.

I was merely referring to the memes that were so popular in HN circles just a few years ago about how Kim Jong Un was too stupid to use a computer[1].

I have no skin in the game, but if the HN crowd is not able to read a PDF with basic Opsec to protect itself from malicious Acrobat exploits, we don't really deserve to be called hackers.

[1] http://www.slate.fr/sites/default/files/styles/1200x680/publ...

Re:The Identity of Kim Il Sung (1949) [pdf] by MichaelCollins on Monday July 25, 2022 @09:34AM (#32224031)
Pay attention to usernames, rjzzleep.

Anyway, muricula didn't say North Koreans don't know how to use computers, so there was no hypocrisy in his suggestion that North Koreans might have competent computer hackers. You're raging at numerous strawmen at once.