News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera... by charlieyu1 on Sunday July 24, 2022 @10:07AM (#32213638)
The current funding system needs a massive change at least. Funding should go to universities in general instead of specific projects. Get rid of most of the KPIs.
Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera... by stewbrew on Sunday July 24, 2022 @10:25AM (#32213790)
So that we can reinstate the old order of eminence-based science? I think the funding system should be rather be more anonymous, more global, more detached from local elites ... like universities, organization close to government/administration etc.

You mustn't forget that universities are only one player of many in the science system. And the main task of some universities rather is education and not research.

Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera... by dahart on Sunday July 24, 2022 @10:14AM (#32213703)
I’ve never seen KPIs in academics, is that a thing now? I’ve seen KPIs in tech companies who like to model Google.

There is a lot of funding going to universities, and a lot going to specific projects. I think maybe the main model for research funding generally is that funding doesn’t just appear, people have to go ask for it in the form of a grant proposal. Those grants typically once granted go 40% to the university anyway. Universities, for their part, have been absorbing money for larger and more expensive administrations for the last 30-40 years, and it’s out of hand. Most people I know practicing science feel the opposite of what you said - that less funding should go to the university and more directly toward funding research.