Re:A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its huma...
by Etheryte on Sunday July 24, 2022 @07:09AM
(#32212260)
This is a common saying or trope with the number varying to a degree. The original version I know of is that in the Soviet military it was an acceptable loss to lose two people out of a hundred during a regular training operation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its huma...
by mdp2021 on Sunday July 24, 2022 @08:26AM
(#32212767)
Some may have put a number somewhere, but the general idea is not unique. And of course, there is that """detail""": «during a regular /training/ operation». This is the humour of Crock (Bill Rechin, Brant Parker and Don Wilder): «Losing fourteen men on patrol bothering you Poulet? You are thinking of bettering it, but we do not have twenty-eight to spare».
More to the glacial reality, it is said that the notorious dictator who made the move in '39, once presented with a report of particularly heavy losses, after a pause said "After all, this is what the young are for". Some people can have so debatable ideas.