Re:South Carolina bill outlaws websites that tell how to get...
by andsoitis on Friday July 22, 2022 @11:12AM
(#32192794)
> largely pulled back because it's constitutional basis was too weak to defend in the Supreme Court
"large pulled back" belies the fact that the motives are ulterior.
> consequences are largely left up to the people who choose to use those things
In the case of banning abortion, you're denying choice and autonomy. You're saying a woman HAS to give birth even if it wasn't her choice. Even if she was raped. Even if she's 10 years old.
If you don't find that stance appalling, I don't know what to say.
"large pulled back" belies the fact that the motives are ulterior.
> consequences are largely left up to the people who choose to use those things
In the case of banning abortion, you're denying choice and autonomy. You're saying a woman HAS to give birth even if it wasn't her choice. Even if she was raped. Even if she's 10 years old.
If you don't find that stance appalling, I don't know what to say.