News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:10gen's response to MongoDB's slams by pork on Wednesday November 09, 2011 @09:38PM (#3218610)
> isn't this how peer review is supposed to work? Someone makes a claim. The claim and the claimant are assessed.

Generally, the claimant is irrelevant in peer review. That's a hard standard to hold up though.

Re:10gen's response to MongoDB's slams by Joakal on Wednesday November 09, 2011 @09:54PM (#3218652)
Generally, there's data to support the submission as well.

The submission did not have the data (logs, bug reports, etc).

So it's pretty much easy to disprove the rant as nothing more than a rant.