Re:Hertz paid Accenture $32M for a website that never went l...
by EddySchauHai on Thursday July 21, 2022 @06:13PM
(#32185856)
Perhaps, but their contributions to the opiate epidemic in the US makes me dislike the company - I know I'd never work there.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hertz paid Accenture $32M for a website that never went l...
by djmips on Thursday July 21, 2022 @11:22PM
(#32188120)
Accord to another article McKinsey "encouraged ICE to give less food and medical care to detainees."
https://mattstoller.substack.com/p/why-taxpayers-pay-mckinse...
Re:Hertz paid Accenture $32M for a website that never went l...
by EddySchauHai on Thursday July 21, 2022 @11:40PM
(#32188240)
> Such practices used to be called “honest graft.” And let’s be clear, McKinsey’s services are very expensive. Back in August, I noted that McKinsey’s competitor, the Boston Consulting Group, charges the government $33,063.75/week for the time of a recent college grad to work as a contractor. Not to be outdone, McKinsey’s pricing is much much higher, with one McKinsey “business analyst” - someone with an undergraduate degree and no experience - lent to the government priced out at $56,707/week, or $2,948,764/year.
And not for a cheap fee either!