Somehow these articles are more readable than typical AI-generated search engine fodder... Is it because I'm entering the site with an expectation of nonsense?

Probably because, by the creator's own admission, the articles are heavily cherry-picked to make sure the output is decent, which is probably a lot more human effort than goes into the aforementioned search engine fodder.

http://dailywrong.com/sample-page/

I would guess that most Spam farms are not using openAI davinci model which is really really good, but expensive. Just a guess.

That's... so weirdly ironic I can't even! Blogspam websites are made by real humans with little oversight, while a literal AI with oversight generates better results.

That said, with a little tweaking, these technologies can - and probably already are - being used to churn out blogspam websites left and right, fully automatic.

So the other men in the pictures are the uncomfortable ones?

Yes, I actually LOLed at that one!