Re:Fields Medal was never meant for ‘the greatest mathematic...
by sverhagen on Monday July 18, 2022 @01:51AM
(#32135137)
I had to read up on these folks to understand that one of them was shot dead at 20, and the other attracted tuberculosis and died at 26.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Fields Medal was never meant for ‘the greatest mathematic...
by cperciva on Monday July 18, 2022 @02:05AM
(#32135225)
Pretty sure you mean "contracted" TB, but the typo did provide a humourous mental image.
Re:Fields Medal was never meant for ‘the greatest mathematic...
by sverhagen on Monday July 18, 2022 @03:58AM
(#32135750)
I probably did. ESL, in over my head.
Re:Fields Medal was never meant for ‘the greatest mathematic...
by mLuby on Monday July 18, 2022 @10:07AM
(#32138543)
Your first clause is complex and correct so you're doing just fine. :)
Re:Fields Medal was never meant for ‘the greatest mathematic...
by rob74 on Monday July 18, 2022 @02:06AM
(#32135233)
...so even at the end of their lives they would have still easily qualified for the Fields Medal. Maybe they should receive a posthumous honorary one. Or maybe they already did?
Re:Fields Medal was never meant for ‘the greatest mathematic...
by raverbashing on Monday July 18, 2022 @02:11AM
(#32135262)
Yes I think Galois deserves a Fields in his name
Re:Fields Medal was never meant for ‘the greatest mathematic...
by uKVZe85V on Monday July 18, 2022 @05:26AM
(#32136220)
Well, not the same, but Galois did get fields in his name, actually https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galois_field . Is that what you intended?
Re:Fields Medal was never meant for ‘the greatest mathematic...
by raverbashing on Monday July 18, 2022 @05:35AM
(#32136268)
Yes, that's the joke ;)