Re:Is JPEG 2000 a preservation risk? (2013)
by josephcsible on Sunday July 17, 2022 @11:34PM
(#32134343)
How common is 4K at 24fps though? I'd expect 4K to usually use higher framerates than that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
24fps is still standard for movies, in part because people have associated higher framerate video with amateur home video recordings so it looks cheap. :)
Re:Is JPEG 2000 a preservation risk? (2013)
by eyelidlessness on Monday July 18, 2022 @01:47AM
(#32135119)
To elaborate on this, higher frame rate video registers the same way to people who aren’t aware that’s what they’re noticing. I was discussing this with my dad just a little over a week ago, where he noted some portion of a movie looked lower production than the rest of the movie. I had noticed it too, because it was visibly higher frame rate. Lower frame rates more closely match the visuals of film, and higher frame rates more closely match the production of daytime TV like judge shows and “soap operas”, and that’s what they visually evoke.
Thankfully this changes with latest generation brought up on 60fps YT and Twitch.
Re:Is JPEG 2000 a preservation risk? (2013)
by chrisseaton on Monday July 18, 2022 @04:48AM
(#32135999)
> I'd expect 4K to usually use higher framerates than that.
They tried higher frame rates with for example the Hobbit, remember, and lots of people didn't like it for some silly reason.