[dead]
Re:Trends in menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vac...
by bandyaboot on Sunday July 17, 2022 @10:46PM
(#32134009)
It wasn’t clear, but the edit wasn’t in reference to the parent commenter. But now that you mention it, yes, for them I’m leaning toward “agenda” rather than the alternative of “non-existent professional ethical standards”.
Edit: it’s pretty sad that there are people who have such an ingrained agenda that they have convinced themselves that, yes, this IS how a professional involved in a scientific public health study behaves.